Thursday, March 22, 2007

Updated agenda - Subject to change

Portland, Maine
Hilton Garden Inn - Downtown

May 10, 2007 – THURSDAY

0900 WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS – Angus King, Former Governor of Maine (Jim to introduce) Introductions at tables among participants (Potential goals/outcomes: Identifying strategies for building a 1:1 program that is financially and pedagogically sustainable; Exchanging ideas among participants from Sweden, Canada, and Maine)

0930 Quick (W/L) activity to generate what they Want to know, and what they Learned after the visit (to be completed upon return-see 1315 below). (WL form provided by Chris and Jill, with instructions)

0945 SITE VISIT – King Middle School, Portland, Maine. Hosted by Principal Mike McCarthy and Technology Integrator David Grant – Visitors to take W/L forms with them for reference during visit.

1230 RETURN TO CONFERENCE SITE –LUNCH ONSITE

1315 -Complete WL activity in small table groups (Fill in and discuss the “L”column)
-Add more questions (W) that arose as a result of the school visits

1330 Panel presentation, questions and discussion (Bette Manchester, Chris Toy, Lisa Hogan, David Grant) various perspectives on the following prompt: What are some key considerations in managing change and innovation with 1:1 computing?

1415 SMALL TABLE BREAKOUTS – DISCUSSION ON CHANGES IN CLASSROOM PRACTICE – (What needs to happen at each of the “levels” to ensure successful change: City/Building/Team-Department/Classroom…Chris and Jill will provide forms and instructions/polygon framework) Table Hosts to Facilitate and Record are Bette Manchester; Jeff Mao. Table guests from Maine’s Middle Schools are David Grant; Lisa Hogan; Rick Barter. Table Leaders from Sweden are xxxx; xxxx; xxxx. Tables will create strategies to ensure that technology investment will lead to improved classroom practice. Examples of strategies under discussion include professional development, curriculum guidance, specialized software, family and community support, etc.
,
1445 Gallery Walk - groups will visit other tables and annotate (write on charts) and take notes on other tables’ ideas. Looking for similarities, differences, agreements, “ah-has”, questions etc.) (5 tables)

1500 Return to home tables. Table leaders facilitate conversation about feedback and questions written during the Gallery Walk.

1520 Tables report out to the large group on conversations. Retain large charts to reduce to documents.

1540 BREAK

1600 TRACKING CHANGE – A RESEARCH AGENDA DIRECTED AT CLASSROOM IMPROVEMENT – Discussion led by Dr. David Silvernail, Center for Education Policy and Applied Research, University of Southern Maine. Dr. Silvernail will outline the research agenda that accompanied the MLTI as well as other technology efforts. Adjust discussion to focus on assessing 21st century skills. Specifically, what are the implications for how traditional assessment needs to change in light of 1:1 learning.

1630 Table leaders will facilitate processing of David’s discussion and the day’s activities using graphic organizer (Here’s What, So What, Now What, Chris and Jill will provide form)

1700 3,2,1 feedback slips ( 3 things I learned today, 2 Questions I have about integrating technology in a cost effective and sustainable manner*, 1 thing that was confirmed for me) and Adjourn

*These responses will be used for panel conversation on 2nd day

May 11, 2007 – FRIDAY

0900 WELCOME BACK – Jill and Chris

0915 DISCUSSION/Panel–(Questions come from 3,2,1 activity) MAKING TECHNOLOGY WORK FOR EDUCATION – Discussion led by Shaun Meredith, Infobridge and Jeff Mao, Director of Education Technology, State of Maine . (Chris and Jill will chart and summarize discussion)

1000 SMALL TABLE BREAKOUTS – DISCUSSION ON MAKING TECHNOLOGY WORK FOR EDUCATION – Table Hosts to Facilitate and Record are Bette Manchester; Chris Toy; Jeff Mao. Table guests from Maine’s Middle Schools are David Grant; Lisa Hogan; Rick Barter. Table Leaders from Sweden are xxxx; xxxx; xxxx. Tables will create strategies to ensure that technology investment will be cost effective and driven by classroom needs. Examples may include hardware needs, software, wireless networks, server strategies (local or hosted), private sector partnerships, staffing levels, professional development for teachers around management and integration with learning, and timely technical support. (Using post it notes, tables will brainstorm strategies/activities then place them on a grid showing cost effectiveness and meeting implementation needs, Jill and Chris will provide graphic)

1115 Gallery Walk and discussion of grids and post-it notes – (participants will make notes of questions, observations, comments, etc) then return to table groups for conversation among themselves.

1130 Whole group sharing about each table’s conversation. (Jill and Chris will facilitate and chart biggies)

11:50 Table leaders will place post-it notes onto a large common grid that will be reduced to a document.
.
1200 WORKING LUNCH – Guest Speakers - Commissioner Susan Gendron, Maine Department of Education (JIM DOYLE TO INVITE ASAP) and Fredrik Hoper (need title?) Talking about Falkenberg project.

1315 DISCUSSION – Angus King and Duke Albanese talking about policy and public support

1345 BREAK

1415 Team planning time – Developing next steps for implementing or sustaining 1:1 learning– Working groups will convene for this segment. Other attendees will sit in on to consult with working groups as plans are worked on. Tables will discuss learnings over the past two days and develop action plans for moving ahead on an implementation plan. (Jill and Chris will provide a graphic organizer for documenting plans.)

1630 Working groups report out

1700 PARTING WORDS – HOST COMMITTEE (Angus and Jim?) – ADJOURN (workshop evaluations, next steps?)

1 comment:

Unknown said...

Is there a possibility to add a sort of parallell track during this program that will focus more on curriculum? What I want is a session where we can exchange ideas on curriculum design from a national/governmental perspective.

From Maine I would like some input from the goverment on how they have changes or see changes coming in the curricula, how they work with this kind of issues. How do you design the goals in order to support the 1 to 1. If we can get participation from the National agency for schools they could give some input on the design-issue in more general terms becouse they have been working a lot on that.